faith

A typical Substack conversation - part 2

0808

— 2 min read

Making claims 

Ah! Those were the days;

There’s nothing quite like like evidence-based dialogue, and this is nothing quite like evidence-based dialogue…

Graeme

You have rejected the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, general relativity, and gravity as we understand it…

  • …all as “Jew junk science.”

You also just claim protons are made of positrons and electrons. They’re not. 

Protons are made of quarks. This is not a matter of interpretation.

You’re not arguing physics, but antisemitism dressed as physics. No amount of evidence will touch it. 

For you it’s an article of faith.

One can no more prove the existence of god than move a believer from their faith. 

You have to keep your heart and mind open if you are intending a serious discussion.

Quarks. Look them up. Then come back.

Evidence, evidence, evidence

The moon is made of green cheese and

  • the stars are little fairies, one for each happy bunny on earth.

The earth sits on the back of a turtle; I know what you’re going to say, young man, very clever, but it’s turtles alllll the way down.

The earth is flat and you can drive off the edge and find god.

Want me to continue?

Graeme, 

the fact of quarks is backed by evidence compiled by scientists with the greatest ethos of all. 

This means there is no one with greater authority than theirs…

Your authority is based on what? 

Research, experiment, study, gods word in your ear?

Graeme, 

facts don’t come into existence just because you say so, or believe so. 

Without evidence, you may as well quote the bible… it’s just as believable or unbelievable as your evidence free claims. 

this subject has been laboured to death. 

If you have compelling evidence, share it.

If you repeat a baseless claim, refer back to this message chain. I won’t be coming up with anything new, and nor will you be.

You have rejected the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, general relativity, and gravity as we understand it — all as “Jew junk science.”

If you reject any scientific discoveries, theories or facts on the basis of the ethnicity or race of the discoverer, you are expressing faith, not practicing science. 

Science is not racist, it’s practical, transparent, reasoned, testable and repeatable. 

Further, and, most significantly, it’s falsifiable…

If you think you’re doing science, you must state under what conditions you would accept you’re wrong. Sadly, your answer is ‘never’; 

  • this is the voice of faith, not science.

I am not a a physicist, and judging by the quality of your scientific rigour, nor are you. 

Every Jew fact you reject is provable, as the product of the most severe peer reviews, consensus, investigation, experiment and proof, largely by non-Jews; 

  • scientific scripture and worship is agnostic…


Read more